![]() [Larger view] | Sliding Doors
| ||||||||||||
| |
Average user rating: ![]() | |
Interesting twist on the "What if" scenario | |
| THE ACTING WAS GREAT, THE STORY A BIT ONE SIDED: Gwyneth Paltrow and Jean Tripplehorn do an excellent job pulling off duel roles for the same character in this romantic/comedy/drama. The leading men are equally charming in both their particular ways. (Tongue in cheek here). The story line is creative as well, but more could have been done a little less extremely. The characters are very one-sided and could have been more creatively handled. BASIC IDEA, WE ALL WONDER WHAT IF: BASIC STORY: DARK VERSUS LIGHT: HATED SOME OF THE ENDING: It was an interesting movie that was at time a bit predictable at times but enjoyable none the less. One wonderfully hysterical part of it was the dialogue between Jerry and his (sympathetic?) mate at the bar. How many louses expect sympathy for their situation. This guy was for real. Also, the British humor was wonderful. What does bollux mean? | |
Do you like your Paltrow with light hair or dark? | |
| Two things are essential if you want to watch this movie. One, you have to like Gwyneth Paltrow, because you're going to see a lot of her; and two, it helps to be a girl. Since I only half qualify I am not the best audience for this corny, but clever, three-quarters cute, romantic comedy. Most of it is standard faire: London girl Helen (Paltrow) has to choose between puppy-eyed loser Gerry (John Lynch) and Good Guy James (John Hannah). Circumstances make the Good Guy look bad while the puppy-eyed loser pouts real well and looks emotionally helpless, so it's tough on our good girl, who's kind of like a Brit Mary Tyler Moore for the nineties. But "she's gonna find true love." Count on it. It's just that there's an hour and a half of misdirection before she does. Paltrow isn't able to display anything close to her full range here, even though the film amounts to a vehicle for her. The clever plot idea is to show her life under one set of circumstances (she misses the train and doesn't meet James) and "a road not taken" (she catches the train and does meet James) in alternating cuts. Surprisingly it works fairly well. To keep us from getting confused, her hair goes short and blonde in one set and long and dark in the other. I like her better with dark hair. She looks more glamorous. I was surprised to notice that back-to-back adoring reviews on Amazon were written by eleven and twelve-year-old girls. When I think about it, that's kind of nice, since this is a sweet movie and those tough little critics are an appropriate audience (along with me, I guess), and this is an advisory tale about the nature of men, illustrating that you have to be careful about whom you choose when you're following your heart. Most fun in the movie is the dirty deeds done by Lydia, (Jeanne Tripplehorn) Helen's rival for Gerry. To humiliate working girl Helen she has her deliver sandwiches and then claims she got food poisoning. To really trash her, Lydia sends her on a phony job interview at her apartment in time to catch her with weasel-willed Gerry while announcing that she's pregnant by same. Our girl's knees buckle, but she stands tall through all the heart-break. | |
Good, Bad, Good, Bad, Good Bad ending | |
| The concept of the movie alone is worth watching the movie. How do lives change when you just miss those sliding doors of the subway? In this movie both options are followed in the life of an excellent Gwyneth Paltrow. The first one she stays with her cheating boyfriend, in the other she doesn't. This goes on for most of the movie. In the end there are some interesting twists. The concept and acting are great, but maybe it could have been a little better worked out. It also looks more like a tv-movie instead of a feature movie, which can be seen in the lighting. |