$18.00  Vogue - Magazine |
$16.95  W - Magazine |
$23.88  InStyle - Magazine |
$14.00  Elle - Magazine |
$12.00  Marie Claire - Magazine |
 [Larger view] | Harper's Bazaar
| ||||||
Average user rating:  | |
 Bright new days may be just around the corner... | |
| In the decade since Liz Tilberis reinvented Bazaar, the magazine has had its share of ups and downs. The tragic loss of Ms. Tilberis was a crushing blow the fashion tome, and it never quite recovered to its former glory. Under the helm of Kate Betts, the magazine ventured into realms that Vogue was already covering, and while I didn't think it was as much of a Vogue doppelganger as many did, the sales figures spoke for themselves. So in comes Glenda Bailey, the woman who brought Marie Claire to the U.S., and the woman slated to bring Bazaar to the top of the fashion heap. So far, what she has done is turn Bazaar into sort of an upscale version of Marie Claire. Obviously she's courting the mainstream. She loves a color theme, she loves an accessory feature. Apparently she hates articles, because they are much fewer and further between. I have to admit that I have enjoyed a few articles in recent issues, and each issue has shown some improvement over the last. Her first official issue was a bit "gimmicky" (the front and back covers with Giselle), and her ideas weren't exactly NEW, but I guess only time will tell. She did manage to sign Stephen Gan as creative director, so some bright new days could be just around the corner. Will Glenda Bailey be the woman to revitalize Bazaar? I think the jury's still out on that issue. I've got my subscription paid up until late 2005.....maybe the picture will be clearer by then. | |
| fur? | |
| Why are the editors hell-bent on featuring fur?! | |
 Pretty... But who can afford this stuff? | |
| I picked up an issue of this monstrosity out of curiosity one day, and I learned my lesson quickly: to never buy it again. Sure, it's glossy and swank, chock-full of fabulousness, but there is one gigantic, glaring problem: NO ONE IN THE INTENDED AGE RANGE CAN AFFORD THESE ITEMS! Unless of course, her Mummy and Daddy have Money to giver her to keep her Happy with such things. Nothing featured in here is under $150, and that's for underwear. UNDERWEAR! (...) No one I know in this mag's intended age range (well, except for one, but that's a long story and she doesn't dress in such things) has the kind of money to drop on $8000 designer dresses that will be out of style in three weeks. Save your money on this worthless rag and buy a new lipstick instead. It'll make you feel much better. |
